René Gabriel
During a Château visit in 1989, I secretly dipped my finger into the barrel and then licked it with relish. Certainly too little to give a valid comment. But I felt like a little boy stealing fruit from the neighbor’s tree.
1993, at the Château, enjoyed as an aperitif with Comte de Lur Saluces: rich, opulent bouquet; vanilla, papaya and passion fruit in very concentrated form, with a glue-like note from the botrytis behind. Full palate, again a lightly exotic fruit presence, rich with a velvety, melting fatness, good supporting acidity, a long, sustained finish. Stylistically very close to the legendary 1975.
1997, a half-bottle: we were happy right up to the moment we brought the wine to our nose: corked! Half-bottle — full frustration!
1998, a double magnum in Munich; corked again!!!
99: intense golden yellow. Equally intense, fine bouquet; expansive — honey, butter and a hint of orange zest. Soft, plush on the palate, nice fullness, but at the moment it lacks a bit of length. Nose better than palate. (19/20).
07: Arno Sgier from the Traube in Trimbach offered us a bottle after fairly extensive, though not excessive, drinking. I noted candied fruit, angelica, acacia honey, and was surprised by the fat body; the acidity polarizes slightly on the tongue, yet beautifully balances the rather forceful, rich sweetness. I was so enthusiastic that I resolved to rate the wine much higher than before and award it at least 19/20 points. Somehow I had anchored it negatively in my memory. But it was the often corked bottles in the past that made me believe that. If you find it in impeccable condition, it is a truly great Yquem — and given the price, perhaps only insiders should know that.
08: at a lunch at Yquem. Before that we had the “fat” 1998. The 1988 seemed almost filigree, delicate and finely nervy afterwards. It is probably the Barsac-like breed that makes the class of this very refined Yquem, which does not come across as very sweet.
09: lunch at Las Cases — a worthy conclusion to a fine midday meal with Wiener schnitzel and homemade pasta. You won’t find that anywhere else in Bordeaux. (18/20).
12: we drank it in Luxembourg next to the full, elegant 2002. It seemed somewhat lean and almost a little wiry, though its pronounced minerality deserves praise. (18/20).
13: seven small, hand-cut glasses filled with a golden nectar from a 3/8 bottle, called 1988 Château d’Yquem, provided the finale. The color quite dark, with an orange shimmer and slightly brownish highlights. The nose, sugar-sweet, raisiny, honey notes and cold chamomile tea. A hint of saffron too, but also something vegetal, a very fine grassy touch. The palate full and rich, with subtly slightly papery contours. In the finish, fine capsular notes with a spicy yet present Semillon noble bitterness. Probably right now on a fairly long plateau.
18: quite golden and luminous, showing fine orange tones within. Opens with mineral aromas, white pepper, dried apricots, hay flowers, raisins and dried figs. Powerful on the palate, showing acidity on the one hand and quite an intense sweetness on the other. Somehow it seems — despite its stated greatness — not yet to have fully found its harmony. But it was clearly the most powerful and perhaps also the most ageworthy wine in this Sauternes line-up. (18/20).
20: already a rather dark golden yellow with ochre reflections. Intense, spicy bouquet, candied peels of kumquats, blood oranges and resinous notes. On the second pass, raisin scent and floral notes (salad burnet). The aromatic profile is somehow “dry-sweet.” On the palate, dancing, highly aromatic and in itself still quite young. The balance is wonderful, and this d’Yquem — which I had previously rather underestimated — now shows itself very elegant, full of finesse, with a beautiful length. This was the best bottle so far! (19/20).